In a significant legal development, Uganda’s High Court has denied bail to opposition leader Dr. Kizza Besigye and his co-accused, Samuel Lubega Mukaaku, despite their prolonged detention exceeding the six-month constitutional limit without trial. The court’s decision has sparked widespread criticism from human rights organizations and opposition groups, who argue that the ruling undermines the rule of law and violates constitutional rights.
Dr. Kizza Besigye, a prominent opposition figure and former presidential candidate, has been detained since June 15, 2022, following his arrest in downtown Kampala for allegedly exhorting Ugandans to rise up against government inaction amid escalating commodity prices. He was charged with incitement to violence and has remained in custody since then. His co-accused, Samuel Lubega Mukaaku, faces similar charges.
In their bail application, the defense team argued that the prolonged detention without trial violated the constitutional rights of the accused, including the right to a fair hearing and the presumption of innocence. They contended that the charges against Besigye and Mukaaku were politically motivated and lacked merit. The defense also highlighted that Besigye had previously been granted bail in similar cases and had complied with all court orders.
However, the High Court dismissed the bail application, stating that the matter should have been first addressed by the Chief Magistrate’s Court before escalating to the High Court. The court noted that Section 75 of the Magistrates Court Act requires that bail applications be made to the Chief Magistrate before seeking relief from the High Court. The prosecution had raised a preliminary objection on this basis, which the court upheld
In response, the defense team expressed disappointment with the ruling, asserting that the decision was a setback for justice and human rights. They vowed to continue pursuing legal avenues to secure the release of Besigye and Mukaaku.
The denial of bail and the referral of the case to the Chief Magistrate’s Court have raised concerns about the independence of Uganda’s judiciary and the treatment of political opponents. Critics argue that the prolonged detention without trial and the denial of bail are indicative of a broader pattern of political repression aimed at silencing dissent ahead of the 2026 elections.
Human rights organizations, including Amnesty International and the Commonwealth, have condemned the ruling, calling for the immediate release of Besigye and Mukaaku. They argue that the continued detention of opposition figures undermines democratic principles and the rule of law in Uganda.
The High Court’s decision to deny bail to Dr. Kizza Besigye and Samuel Lubega Mukaaku has intensified political tensions in Uganda. As the case progresses, it will likely remain a focal point for discussions on judicial independence, political freedoms, and human rights in the country. The international community continues to monitor the situation closely, urging the Ugandan government to uphold its commitments to democratic governance and the protection of fundamental rights.